Too Big to Know

The book discusses how expertise is distributed now, but I wonder how this affects our ability to evaluate information ourselves. Do we become more dependent on the 'room' rather than our own judgment?

Some of the stories about how facts evolve over time really challenged my understanding of certainty. Which examples resonated most or made you rethink what you consider 'true'?

That concept really struck me as a revolutionary way to think about collective intelligence. I’d love to know what prompted him to emphasize the importance of networks and communities in knowledge creation.