How did the choice to tell the story as an oral history impact the emotional depth?
Around the Web·先月


読者同士のディスカッションは今すぐ開かれています。認証済み著者はこのプロフィールを申請後に参加できます。
How did the choice to tell the story as an oral history impact the emotional depth?
Did anyone else find the multiple perspectives added to the sense of chaos?
I wonder what led the author to focus so heavily on the aftermath rather than the outbreak itself?