The Imitation Game

Balancing technical history with personal stories can be tricky. I'm curious what motivated the emphasis on Turing's LGBT identity and how that shaped the narrative.

I appreciated how the visuals simplified some of the code-breaking processes, but did others find it effective or oversimplified certain parts?

This approach seems to humanize Turing more vividly, but I wonder if it also risks losing some details in the process. What’s the balance between art and accuracy?