Can We Talk About Israel?

Given how charged discussions about Israel can be, I'm curious what motivated Sokatch to approach it as a curious and conflicted reader might. Did he aim to bridge divides or challenge misconceptions?

The way the book breaks down key events and myths made me see the conflict in a new light. I'm wondering if others felt similarly or if some parts felt oversimplified.

It seems to aim for a balanced view, but I wonder if some readers might feel it leans toward a particular narrative. Did it succeed in fostering understanding across divides?