How did the author decide on the structure of presenting 300 arguments?
Around the Web·先月
読者同士のディスカッションは今すぐ開かれています。認証済み著者はこのプロフィールを申請後に参加できます。
How did the author decide on the structure of presenting 300 arguments?
Did anyone else find certain arguments unexpectedly moving or revealing?
What inspired Sarah Manguso to compile these particular arguments into this book?