The Order of the Day

The book weaves together various events in a way that feels both meticulous and urgent. I'm curious what motivated him to highlight these particular episodes.

The brevity and almost report-like tone made the events feel stark and impactful, but I wonder if others felt it minimized the emotional weight at times.

His portrayal raises questions about complicity and the choices leaders made. Does this storytelling style help or hinder grasping the gravity of those decisions?