Parliament of Whores

The book manages to be both funny and insightful, but I wonder what inspired the approach of mixing comedy with serious critique. Did he see humor as the best way to get people to think differently about politics?

Some jokes felt timeless, but others seemed rooted in the political climate of the early 2000s. I'm curious if readers find the humor still resonates or if it feels dated now.

His choice to critique the entire system was bold. I wonder if it was personal frustration, a desire to challenge power, or simply a way to entertain while making a point.