Without Remorse Part I of II

The detailed history adds depth but also raises questions about how much of it was drawn from real military experiences or fiction. I'm curious about the creative choices behind this.

The story felt relentless towards the end, which was exciting but maybe a bit rushed. Was this intentional to keep the adrenaline high?

His decisions are often morally complex, making me think about the line between hero and antihero. How did others interpret his choices?