The New Kings of Nonfiction

I'm curious about the selection process—did he aim for a specific theme or a variety of styles? It made me think about how editors curate nonfiction anthologies.

Some pieces felt so compelling and persuasive, while others left me questioning the author’s perspective. I'd love to hear others’ thoughts on which essays had the biggest impact.

Their work feels so timely and influential. I wonder if there was a personal connection or a desire to highlight overlooked voices in nonfiction.