Listen, Liberal: Or, What Ever Happened to the Party of the People

The book traces a specific period of political change, but I'm curious what motivated the author to zero in on this era and these policies.

There was so much detail, and I appreciated the depth, but it made me wonder how accessible the arguments are for readers less familiar with economics.

Frank's tone is direct and sometimes provocative — does this style make the critique more compelling or might it alienate some readers?