Buddha: A Story of Enlightenment

The story delves into the emotional and philosophical challenges Buddha faced. I wonder what motivated this humanized portrayal instead of a purely historical account.

The book weaves profound teachings into a compelling narrative, but I’m curious if others felt the flow was seamless or if some parts felt more didactic.

Focusing on his internal struggles makes the story more relatable, but does it also risk oversimplifying the historical figure’s complexity?