صناعة التاريخ

Fry's wit adds a light touch to serious events, but I wonder if it sometimes downplays the gravity of history. Did the humor enhance or detract from the story for others?

The choices felt intentional but also surprising at times. I'm curious what guided the selection of characters and events to reimagine.

Some sections moved quickly while others slowed down significantly. Wondering if this was a deliberate stylistic choice or just the flow of the narrative.