Killer in the Kremlin

Understanding the background behind this biography might shed light on how the narrative was shaped. I'm curious about the research process and choices made.

The intricate plots and betrayals made me think about how much of politics is just chess. Did others feel a sense of unease or admiration at the same time?

With so much history to cover, it’s interesting to see what was prioritized. I wonder if there were key moments that the author felt defined his trajectory.