Impeached

The detailed recounting of the trial made me wonder how much of this was driven by available sources versus the author's interpretation. Did the author aim to highlight a specific aspect of Johnson's presidency or the impeachment process itself?

Johnson's actions seemed complex, and I kept questioning whether he was driven by personal beliefs or political pressure. How do others interpret his role in this pivotal moment?

The book introduces several figures beyond the main players, and I wonder what guided the selection—was it to provide a more rounded view or to highlight specific perspectives?