Denialism

The book covers science, politics, and psychology—how did the author decide which areas to include and connect? I'm curious about the overarching message.

Some cases felt so ingrained in our society that it was hard to see them as purely irrational. Did others find certain examples more relatable or troubling?

The book hints at ways to challenge irrational thinking, but I'm wondering if there are specific strategies or approaches that stood out as promising.