Brainwashed

The argument is provocative and makes me wonder whether these claims are based on specific experiences or broader trends. I'm curious about the author's motivation behind this framing.

While some cases seemed convincing, others felt like they might be cherry-picked. How do readers interpret the balance between valid critique and overgeneralization?

Given the strong stance, I'm wondering whether it will spark meaningful debate or deepen existing divides. What impact might it have on campus conversations?