An Instance of the Fingerpost

The story's shifting narrators offered conflicting accounts, making me question what was real. Did anyone else find their trust in the narrators wavering?

The alternating viewpoints added complexity and depth, but I wonder if that was planned from the start or evolved during writing. How did it impact the story's flow?

The 17th-century backdrop felt immersive and gave extra weight to moral dilemmas. Did the historical details enhance your engagement or feel overwhelming?