تناقض الرؤى: الجذور الأيديولوجية للصراعات السياسية

His approach offers a unique lens on ideological clashes, but I'm curious what motivated this particular framework. Did Sowell draw from specific historical moments or theories?

It really clarified why political debates often seem to talk past each other. I'm wondering if this dichotomy resonates with real-world policy disagreements I've seen.

Since the book was written some time ago, I wonder if Sowell's insights still feel relevant or if recent events have shifted the landscape of these visions.